Saludos,
La acción de interviniente de referencia fue presentada el 15 de abril de 2011, para proteger y hacer cumplir la prenda de abogado de Virginia, Estados Unidos, sobre la reclamación de la empresa Sea Search Armada de lo naufragios de tesoro avaluados en $ 17 billones de dólares y hundidos en el mar de la costa de la República de Colombia.
En relación con la acción anterior, se persentó también la demanda de Irene Rodríguez e Isidoro Rodríguez vs. Douglas Shulman y Sea Search Armada et al., Corte Distrital del Distrito de Columbia, caso No. 11-cv-01183 (JEB)(Junio 28, 2011) en contra de una mafia interestatal motivada por intereses financieros, cronismo, y/o animosidad por la independencia de los abogados demandantes ante los actos oligarcas de Sea Search Armada et al., sus grupos de presión en Washington/abogados, emplea-dos y abogados del gobierno de Estados Unidos, y jueces federales y del estado de Virginia fuera de su jurisdicción y autoridad judicial y ministerial mediante opresión bajo el nonbre de la ley.
En resumen, esta mafia interestatal comenzó en el 2003 al castigar al abogado Isidoro Rodríguez en retaliación por: (1) litigar a nombre de ciudadanos hispanos de Estados Unidos y Colombia no residentes en los Estados Unidos (e.g. Martinez vs. Lamagno y DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995)); (2) litigar para proteger sus dechos de propiedad bajo codigo como abogado de Virginia; y (3) pedir al Congreso de los Estados Unidos que investigara a los abogados del Departamento de Justicia y algunos jueces
por obstruir sus derechos bajo tratado internacional, código, y un acuerdo de custodia compartida (http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml).
En 2006 esta conspiracion fue aumentada al privar a Irene e Isidoro Rodríguez (esposos y socios en su firma de abogados) de su derecho a tener su negocio independiente, mediante realizar a propósito actos de traición en violación del Artículo IV Sección 4 de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos, la Doctrina de Orden Nula, el Código de Impuestos, el Decreto de Acciones de Mafia Organizada (conocido en inglés por los siglas “R.I.C.O.”), la decisión de Bivens v. Seis Agentes Desconocidos de la Oficina Federal de Narcóticos, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), y el principio legal que dicta la separación de poder bajo la sistema constitucional de los Estados Unidos (ver http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance, and http://home.earthlink.net/~treason).
Por consiguiente, este comunicado de prensa es una alerta para que se investigue lo que parece ser un patron de acción parte de un grupo oligarca en Washington D.C. que trata de bloquear el acceso a una corte impacial y a un juicio por jurado para proteger su dereecho de propiedad y al empleo independiente de los ciudadanos.
Isidoro Rodriguez Dra. Irene Rodriguez
Member the Ct. of App for the Federal Circuit Attorney admitted in Rep. of Colombia
THE LAW OFFICES OF ISIDORO RODRIGUEZ
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
Northern Virginia Office: South American Office:
7924 Peyton Forest Trail World Trade Center
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560 Calle 76 No. 54-11, Suite 313
Telephone/telefax: 571.423.5066 Barranquilla, Colombia
Mobil: 703.470.1457 E-mail: irenerod@earthlink.net
Email: isidoror@earthlink.net
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Friday, August 28, 2009
Monday, August 24, 2009
Greetings to All,
As a starting point in any discussion regarding the right to citizens to hold the government accountable for abuse of War Powers we must first turn to the opinion of Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Crunch 137 at 140, wherein he confirmed certain fundamental principles of our constitutional system: first, that “We the people,” had united to establish a limited federal government; second, that “We the people” organized the federal government into three departments with assigned limited powers, while at the same time prohibiting abuse of these limited powers; and, third, that these limits would be a useless if they “at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained.”
From this it is clear that the Constitution is the “paramount law,” which may not be changed by either Legislative, or Executive, or the Judicial Branch fiat.
However, base on my more than three decades as an independent federal civil trial/appellate litigator, I write that the Rehnquist/Roberts Court have conspired with government attorneys to grant the government total immunity for malfeasance and abuse the delegation from Congress under the Judiciary Act of 1925, the Rules Enabling Act, and U.S. Judicial Conference Act, to deprive citizens of fundamental rights under the Constitution, and statutory rights under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Watergate legislation.
The Rule of Law has now become a political slogan and not a reality. Citizens no longer have the right to assure that the Federal government does not act outside of the limits of the powers we have delegated to it.
We as citizens must all be concerned by this coup d’etat of the legal profession because history has shown that Democracies are precarious institutions. Constant vigilance must be maintained to preserve our Nation from undue government encroachment by legal sophistry. We all must remember the sorry behavior of German judges and lawyers during Nazi era which did play an important part in allowing Hitler to power, because “[by] the time the gas vans came and the human slaughter factories were built in Auschwitz and the other death camps, the murder of the six million Jews and other persecuted minorities was done completely within the framework of German law.” Professor Michael Bazyler, The Legacy of the Holocaust and Lessons for Today: Research for a New Textbook Holocaust, Genocide, and the Law, Yad Vshem The Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes Remembrance Authority, 2004.
Thus, irrespective of one being either a Republican, Democrat, Liberal, all citizens must take action to stop what has come to pass during the past 35 years. As Thomas Jefferson foretold, "[t]he germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."
By judicial fiat the courts have usurped legislative power by the promulgation of rules which: ● the deny access to an impartial court to stop malfeasance, see http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml; ● deny right to impartial jury trials of malfeasance; ● assumed away the power of citizens under the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution; ● used of court cronyism to do away with independent federal civil practitioners; ● held that outside of the US there are no Constitutional restrictions on government power; and, ● held that both the Executive and Judicial Branch are absolutely immune from suit for either criminal or tortious acts (see http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror)
Because of the evidence of this malfeasance of the Federal Judicial Branch conspiring with government attorneys to obstruct my rights as a father I have filed Federal Criminal Complaints under RICO in Virginia, D.C., Colorado, NY, and Pennsylvania ( http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/ and http://home.earthlink.net/~treason/ ).
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
Bar Member in good Standing of the U.S. Supreme Court
7924Payton Forest Trail
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560
Telephone: 571.423.5066
As a starting point in any discussion regarding the right to citizens to hold the government accountable for abuse of War Powers we must first turn to the opinion of Chief Justice John Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, 1 Crunch 137 at 140, wherein he confirmed certain fundamental principles of our constitutional system: first, that “We the people,” had united to establish a limited federal government; second, that “We the people” organized the federal government into three departments with assigned limited powers, while at the same time prohibiting abuse of these limited powers; and, third, that these limits would be a useless if they “at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained.”
From this it is clear that the Constitution is the “paramount law,” which may not be changed by either Legislative, or Executive, or the Judicial Branch fiat.
However, base on my more than three decades as an independent federal civil trial/appellate litigator, I write that the Rehnquist/Roberts Court have conspired with government attorneys to grant the government total immunity for malfeasance and abuse the delegation from Congress under the Judiciary Act of 1925, the Rules Enabling Act, and U.S. Judicial Conference Act, to deprive citizens of fundamental rights under the Constitution, and statutory rights under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Watergate legislation.
The Rule of Law has now become a political slogan and not a reality. Citizens no longer have the right to assure that the Federal government does not act outside of the limits of the powers we have delegated to it.
We as citizens must all be concerned by this coup d’etat of the legal profession because history has shown that Democracies are precarious institutions. Constant vigilance must be maintained to preserve our Nation from undue government encroachment by legal sophistry. We all must remember the sorry behavior of German judges and lawyers during Nazi era which did play an important part in allowing Hitler to power, because “[by] the time the gas vans came and the human slaughter factories were built in Auschwitz and the other death camps, the murder of the six million Jews and other persecuted minorities was done completely within the framework of German law.” Professor Michael Bazyler, The Legacy of the Holocaust and Lessons for Today: Research for a New Textbook Holocaust, Genocide, and the Law, Yad Vshem The Holocaust Martyrs’ and Heroes Remembrance Authority, 2004.
Thus, irrespective of one being either a Republican, Democrat, Liberal, all citizens must take action to stop what has come to pass during the past 35 years. As Thomas Jefferson foretold, "[t]he germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."
By judicial fiat the courts have usurped legislative power by the promulgation of rules which: ● the deny access to an impartial court to stop malfeasance, see http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml; ● deny right to impartial jury trials of malfeasance; ● assumed away the power of citizens under the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution; ● used of court cronyism to do away with independent federal civil practitioners; ● held that outside of the US there are no Constitutional restrictions on government power; and, ● held that both the Executive and Judicial Branch are absolutely immune from suit for either criminal or tortious acts (see http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror)
Because of the evidence of this malfeasance of the Federal Judicial Branch conspiring with government attorneys to obstruct my rights as a father I have filed Federal Criminal Complaints under RICO in Virginia, D.C., Colorado, NY, and Pennsylvania ( http://home.earthlink.net/~malfeasance/ and http://home.earthlink.net/~treason/ ).
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
Bar Member in good Standing of the U.S. Supreme Court
7924Payton Forest Trail
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560
Telephone: 571.423.5066
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Criminal Complaint for Prosecution of Government Officials and Judges Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice
Greetings:
In retaliation for undersign counsel’s 2005 complaint to Congress and law enforcement for an investigation of the criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204 by Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys, government attorneys and judges’ obstruction of his rights as a father under Treaty and statute (see http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml, and Affidavit Exhibit 1), an interstate criminal conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 4, 201, 241, 242, 1341, 1343, 1513, 1951, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) – 18 U.S.C. §1962( c ) and (d), as well as Va. Code § 18.2-481(5), 2-482, and, 499, was undertaken by government officials and judges at both the Federal and State level to “[resist] the execution of the laws under color of authority.”
The linchpin of the interstate criminal conspiracy was to deprive undersign counsel of his right to employment as a federal civil litigator by:
(I) the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“VSBDB”) issuing a void order because it is not a “court” created in compliance with Va. Constitution and Va. Code, to revoke his license based on the use of interstate mail and wire communication from the District of Columbia and the State of Washington into the Commonwealth of Virginia so to file fraudulent bar complaints by Beltway Lobbyist/Attorney Eric Holder and undersign counsel’s former client-both in retaliation for undersign counsel litigating respectively to enforce his federal and Virginia statutory rights as a father; and litigating to protect his property rights in his perfected statutory Virginia Attorneys’s Lien based on 12 years of contract litigation under a contingency fee for clients 50% share of approximately $3 Billion USD of sunken treasure trove off the coast of the Republic of Colombia (http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul06-dec06.html);
(II) the D. C. Court of Appeals Committee on Admission use of interstate mail and wire communication to conspire shelve undersign counsel’s 2005 waiver application and to then disregard his right and demand for a public hearing on his right pursuant to the Void Order Doctrine to practice law in D.C.; and,
(III) the judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit use of interstate mail and wire communication to conspire with Forth/D.C. Circuit Justice and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G . Roberts, to: first, violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 4 and 3771, by refusing to protect undersign counsel as a victim of the on going interstate criminal conspiracy; and, second, for them to conspire to deny undersign counsel impartial judicial review in violation of the Void Order Doctrine mandated by Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803), Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 US 714 (1877), Selling v. Redford, 243 U.S. 46 (1917), and, Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278 (1957)- - so to surreally “regard” the VSBDB void order issued outside of their authority and jurisdiction, as valid one issued by a “court” created in compliance with Va. Constitution and Va. Code.
The commission of the above chargeable or indictable or punishable predicate offenses, by government officials and judges using interstate mail or wire fraud and Hobbs Acts offenses as a “pattern of racketeering” from 2005 to the present has deprived undersign counsel of his Constitutional and federal statutory rights to his business, profession, employment, and unemployment compensation as a citizen of the United States, as a father, and as an independent pro hoc vice federal civil litigator.
Thus, I am filing with each of you the attach Draft Federal Criminal Complaint, Affidavit of Probable Cause, and Memorandum of Law based on the evidence of the on going interstate criminal conspiracy (See, Affidavit and Exhibit 2,http://home.earthlink.net/~treason/, Virginia Criminal Complaint for Treason, etc.; see also, http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror, and 2009 presentation to Northern VA Delegates, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAkEfjcA5sQ).
My actions to defend my rights as a citizen and attorney are not taken lightly. They are pursuant to my oath taken 45 years ago as a Nam Vet and later as a Carter/Reagan White House appointee to defend and protect the Constitution from all enemies “foreign and domestic.” Query, if I as an experienced federal trail/appellate litigator can be deprived of access to an impartial jury trial and court under civil RICO, the Federal Tort Claims Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pursuant to an on going criminal conspiracy by government attorneys and judges, what is either a young inexperience attorney or a layman father to do to secure rights and accountability for malfeasance?
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4, as well as Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, I demand that the Philadelphia, Field Office of the FBI investigate and the United States Attorney for Pennsylvania indict and persecute to protect me as a victim of this on going criminal conspiracy by government officials and judges acting outside of their authority and jurisdiction.
I respectfully remind each of you that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4, knowledge of the criminal conspiracy and your jurisdiction to pursue those responsible, imposes upon you the legal obligation to investigate, arrest, indict, and prosecute the named defendant co-conspirators. Furthermore, I request as the victim of the on going criminal acts I be kept informed of the status of the investigation as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
Sincerely,
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
Attachment
cc: President Barack Obama
Senate Judiciary Committee
House Judiciary Committee
Members of Senate and House of Representatives to Congress
In retaliation for undersign counsel’s 2005 complaint to Congress and law enforcement for an investigation of the criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204 by Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys, government attorneys and judges’ obstruction of his rights as a father under Treaty and statute (see http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml, and Affidavit Exhibit 1), an interstate criminal conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 4, 201, 241, 242, 1341, 1343, 1513, 1951, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) – 18 U.S.C. §1962( c ) and (d), as well as Va. Code § 18.2-481(5), 2-482, and, 499, was undertaken by government officials and judges at both the Federal and State level to “[resist] the execution of the laws under color of authority.”
The linchpin of the interstate criminal conspiracy was to deprive undersign counsel of his right to employment as a federal civil litigator by:
(I) the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“VSBDB”) issuing a void order because it is not a “court” created in compliance with Va. Constitution and Va. Code, to revoke his license based on the use of interstate mail and wire communication from the District of Columbia and the State of Washington into the Commonwealth of Virginia so to file fraudulent bar complaints by Beltway Lobbyist/Attorney Eric Holder and undersign counsel’s former client-both in retaliation for undersign counsel litigating respectively to enforce his federal and Virginia statutory rights as a father; and litigating to protect his property rights in his perfected statutory Virginia Attorneys’s Lien based on 12 years of contract litigation under a contingency fee for clients 50% share of approximately $3 Billion USD of sunken treasure trove off the coast of the Republic of Colombia (http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul06-dec06.html);
(II) the D. C. Court of Appeals Committee on Admission use of interstate mail and wire communication to conspire shelve undersign counsel’s 2005 waiver application and to then disregard his right and demand for a public hearing on his right pursuant to the Void Order Doctrine to practice law in D.C.; and,
(III) the judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit use of interstate mail and wire communication to conspire with Forth/D.C. Circuit Justice and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G . Roberts, to: first, violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 4 and 3771, by refusing to protect undersign counsel as a victim of the on going interstate criminal conspiracy; and, second, for them to conspire to deny undersign counsel impartial judicial review in violation of the Void Order Doctrine mandated by Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803), Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 US 714 (1877), Selling v. Redford, 243 U.S. 46 (1917), and, Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278 (1957)- - so to surreally “regard” the VSBDB void order issued outside of their authority and jurisdiction, as valid one issued by a “court” created in compliance with Va. Constitution and Va. Code.
The commission of the above chargeable or indictable or punishable predicate offenses, by government officials and judges using interstate mail or wire fraud and Hobbs Acts offenses as a “pattern of racketeering” from 2005 to the present has deprived undersign counsel of his Constitutional and federal statutory rights to his business, profession, employment, and unemployment compensation as a citizen of the United States, as a father, and as an independent pro hoc vice federal civil litigator.
Thus, I am filing with each of you the attach Draft Federal Criminal Complaint, Affidavit of Probable Cause, and Memorandum of Law based on the evidence of the on going interstate criminal conspiracy (See, Affidavit and Exhibit 2,http://home.earthlink.net/~treason/, Virginia Criminal Complaint for Treason, etc.; see also, http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror, and 2009 presentation to Northern VA Delegates, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAkEfjcA5sQ).
My actions to defend my rights as a citizen and attorney are not taken lightly. They are pursuant to my oath taken 45 years ago as a Nam Vet and later as a Carter/Reagan White House appointee to defend and protect the Constitution from all enemies “foreign and domestic.” Query, if I as an experienced federal trail/appellate litigator can be deprived of access to an impartial jury trial and court under civil RICO, the Federal Tort Claims Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pursuant to an on going criminal conspiracy by government attorneys and judges, what is either a young inexperience attorney or a layman father to do to secure rights and accountability for malfeasance?
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4, as well as Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, I demand that the Philadelphia, Field Office of the FBI investigate and the United States Attorney for Pennsylvania indict and persecute to protect me as a victim of this on going criminal conspiracy by government officials and judges acting outside of their authority and jurisdiction.
I respectfully remind each of you that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4, knowledge of the criminal conspiracy and your jurisdiction to pursue those responsible, imposes upon you the legal obligation to investigate, arrest, indict, and prosecute the named defendant co-conspirators. Furthermore, I request as the victim of the on going criminal acts I be kept informed of the status of the investigation as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
Sincerely,
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
Attachment
cc: President Barack Obama
Senate Judiciary Committee
House Judiciary Committee
Members of Senate and House of Representatives to Congress
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)