Greetings:
In retaliation for undersign counsel’s 2005 complaint to Congress and law enforcement for an investigation of the criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204 by Beltway Lobbyists/Attorneys, government attorneys and judges’ obstruction of his rights as a father under Treaty and statute (see http://www.liamsdad.org/others/isidoro.shtml, and Affidavit Exhibit 1), an interstate criminal conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 4, 201, 241, 242, 1341, 1343, 1513, 1951, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) – 18 U.S.C. §1962( c ) and (d), as well as Va. Code § 18.2-481(5), 2-482, and, 499, was undertaken by government officials and judges at both the Federal and State level to “[resist] the execution of the laws under color of authority.”
The linchpin of the interstate criminal conspiracy was to deprive undersign counsel of his right to employment as a federal civil litigator by:
(I) the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“VSBDB”) issuing a void order because it is not a “court” created in compliance with Va. Constitution and Va. Code, to revoke his license based on the use of interstate mail and wire communication from the District of Columbia and the State of Washington into the Commonwealth of Virginia so to file fraudulent bar complaints by Beltway Lobbyist/Attorney Eric Holder and undersign counsel’s former client-both in retaliation for undersign counsel litigating respectively to enforce his federal and Virginia statutory rights as a father; and litigating to protect his property rights in his perfected statutory Virginia Attorneys’s Lien based on 12 years of contract litigation under a contingency fee for clients 50% share of approximately $3 Billion USD of sunken treasure trove off the coast of the Republic of Colombia (http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul06-dec06.html);
(II) the D. C. Court of Appeals Committee on Admission use of interstate mail and wire communication to conspire shelve undersign counsel’s 2005 waiver application and to then disregard his right and demand for a public hearing on his right pursuant to the Void Order Doctrine to practice law in D.C.; and,
(III) the judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit use of interstate mail and wire communication to conspire with Forth/D.C. Circuit Justice and U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G . Roberts, to: first, violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 4 and 3771, by refusing to protect undersign counsel as a victim of the on going interstate criminal conspiracy; and, second, for them to conspire to deny undersign counsel impartial judicial review in violation of the Void Order Doctrine mandated by Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803), Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 US 714 (1877), Selling v. Redford, 243 U.S. 46 (1917), and, Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278 (1957)- - so to surreally “regard” the VSBDB void order issued outside of their authority and jurisdiction, as valid one issued by a “court” created in compliance with Va. Constitution and Va. Code.
The commission of the above chargeable or indictable or punishable predicate offenses, by government officials and judges using interstate mail or wire fraud and Hobbs Acts offenses as a “pattern of racketeering” from 2005 to the present has deprived undersign counsel of his Constitutional and federal statutory rights to his business, profession, employment, and unemployment compensation as a citizen of the United States, as a father, and as an independent pro hoc vice federal civil litigator.
Thus, I am filing with each of you the attach Draft Federal Criminal Complaint, Affidavit of Probable Cause, and Memorandum of Law based on the evidence of the on going interstate criminal conspiracy (See, Affidavit and Exhibit 2,http://home.earthlink.net/~treason/, Virginia Criminal Complaint for Treason, etc.; see also, http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror, and 2009 presentation to Northern VA Delegates, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAkEfjcA5sQ).
My actions to defend my rights as a citizen and attorney are not taken lightly. They are pursuant to my oath taken 45 years ago as a Nam Vet and later as a Carter/Reagan White House appointee to defend and protect the Constitution from all enemies “foreign and domestic.” Query, if I as an experienced federal trail/appellate litigator can be deprived of access to an impartial jury trial and court under civil RICO, the Federal Tort Claims Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pursuant to an on going criminal conspiracy by government attorneys and judges, what is either a young inexperience attorney or a layman father to do to secure rights and accountability for malfeasance?
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4, as well as Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, I demand that the Philadelphia, Field Office of the FBI investigate and the United States Attorney for Pennsylvania indict and persecute to protect me as a victim of this on going criminal conspiracy by government officials and judges acting outside of their authority and jurisdiction.
I respectfully remind each of you that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4, knowledge of the criminal conspiracy and your jurisdiction to pursue those responsible, imposes upon you the legal obligation to investigate, arrest, indict, and prosecute the named defendant co-conspirators. Furthermore, I request as the victim of the on going criminal acts I be kept informed of the status of the investigation as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
Sincerely,
Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
Attachment
cc: President Barack Obama
Senate Judiciary Committee
House Judiciary Committee
Members of Senate and House of Representatives to Congress
No comments:
Post a Comment